The definition of totalitarianism that Danielle found, as "a political system whereby a state regulates every aspect of public and private life", completely applies to the reign of Peter the Great. I think that a factor that might differentiate Hitler's reign and that of Peter the Great is perhaps the reason WHY they implemented such structures. To me, it seems as if Hitler wasn't necessarily acting to prove himself as the greatest power, instead, he was acting to expedite proving the power of the German state. Hitler wanted to create a pure world, one exclusive to the Aryan race, and he also wanted to demonstrate the power of the German peoples. Consequently, Hitler's regulation of the German state seems to be very dependent on using the German state as an example for the rest of the world. The Russian reforms implemented by Peter the Great, such as the reformation of the Russian Orthodox Church as well as the switch to have the state control the economy, were all attempts to modernize Russia to make it a great world power.
In both cases, that of Hitler and that of Peter the Great, the rulers were acting on behalf of their state in an attempt to prove the power, not necessarily of themselves, but of their country to the rest of Europe, which I believe to be a defining characteristic of a totalitarian leader.
No comments:
Post a Comment