In my opinion, the Soviet Union's implementation of the Warsaw Pact was a demonstration of such manipulation of power. While the Warsaw Pact is technically an agreement between the Soviet Union, Albania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and East Germany, it seems to me as if the members of the Warsaw Pact didn't really have a choice--the Soviet Union was a powerful, threatening force. Thus, in agreeing to the Warsaw Pact, those other countries gain the "support" of the Soviet Union, however, those other countries probably didn't have much choice--they couldn't exactly just reject the Soviet Union. While the Warsaw Pact wasn't necessarily an active invasion or imposition of influence, that same influence was still implied through such a pact.
The influence of the rivalry between the superpowers was ultimately the unwilling (or maybe superficial) alliance formed between other countries and the superpowers. Since the US and the Soviet Union were two of the strongest countries in the world, they essentially had control or influence over whatever country they wanted. Such involvement of other countries was temperamental--able to change depending on whether or not the superpower needed that country for a particular reason.
Thank you for the feedback on the simulation. It is interesting that it was Mexico that was the focus of efforts in the game, though in real life, it was Cuba that was the scene of struggle. Your point on the two alliances is well taken. The issue you highlight is coercion. States in Western Europe had a choice-=France was in and then out (with de Gaulle) of NATO. In the east, tthe USSR determined who was in, apart from independent states like Albania (left practically in 1961, and officially in 1968) and Yugoslavia that were not under the overall hegemony of the USSR.
ReplyDelete